There Would Also Be a Mechanism to

shovo0032

Issues of Doing This Aside the Effect Would Be to Take Money From the Head and Pump It Back Into the Tail. It Would Be Harder to Build Empires Off the Previously Free Content Others Produce. It Would Send Money Back to Producers. It Also Eliminates the Piracy Question. Producers Would Want People to Copy Remix and Redistribute Their Content as the More People That Use It the More Money They Make. Also With the Integration of Twoway Linking the Mechanism Lanier Proposes to Keep Track of Ownership and Credit Youd Always Know Who is Using Your Content. Information Would No Longer Be Free. It Would Be.

Affordable in the Broadest Sense of the Word.  Reward the Production and a Mechanism to Reward the Most Relevant Information the Most. The More You Contribute to the Net and the More People Use It the More You Make. Tiny Payments. Incremental. Ongoing. Interesting Questions So if These Italy Telegram Number Data Questions Are of Interest to You Id Encourage You to Read Who Owns the Future by Jaron Lanier. Its Often Rambling in a Good Way and Heads Off on Wild Tangents in a Good Way and You Can Tell There is a Very Intelligent and Thoughtful Guy Behind It All. Hes Asking Some Pretty Big Relevant Questions. His Answers.

   

Are Sketches That Should Be Challenged Argued Debated and Enlarged. And if Big Tech Companies Want a Challenge That Really Will Change the World Perhaps They Could Direct All That Intellect Wealth and Power Towards Enriching the Ecosystem at a Pace Faster Than They Potentially Gouge It. Why the Yahoo Search Revenue Gap Wont Close In Spite of Yahoo Accepting Revenue Guarantees for Another Year From Microsoft Recently There Has Been Speculation That Yahoo Might Want to Get Out of Their Search Ad Deal With Microsoft. I Am Uncertain if the Back Channeled Story is Used as Leverage to Secure Ongoing Minimum Revenue.